Thursday, April 30, 2020

Massive Budget Deficits

I saw a casual friend who expressed deep concern about the cost of Covid-19 mitigation and what that would do over the longer term to the United States. That is certainly a valid concern, since we were on track to have a trillion dollar deficit this year even before the pandemic, and we’ve now committed to spending trillions more to mitigate the damage to the economy from this.

The first question is how we even deal with this. The simple answer of course is higher revenue (i.e. higher taxes) and lower spending. We have to have some way of doing both that does not cripple the economy. We then need to muster the political will to actually implement the necessary changes. With both, there will be people who are hurt and those people will apply political pressure to avoid paying for those changes.

The second question is who pays for this and how do we implement it. I have my own ideas, and while I have a decent foundation in economics, I can’t readily calculate the full costs of the changes. The Covid-19 relief efforts should be a short term thing. We can’t ignore them, but should not base our entire strategy on something that should phase out probably within the next year. That said, our primary concern should be in crafting something that will largely eliminate the trillion dollar deficit we were already expecting.

On the top of my list would be repealing the 2017 Trump tax cuts. The cost of that alone has been estimated at over 2 trillion dollars over several years. In itself that would not even erase the previous annual deficit, but at least it would reduce it. While many people got at least some benefit from those tax cuts, the lion’s share went to the wealthiest individuals and corporations.

The second thing I’d do is raise the top marginal tax rates. In the 1950s and early 1960s, when the economy was doing quite well, our top marginal income tax rate was 90% or more. Businesses still thrived, and people still became wealthy even at that. I don’t think we should go back to that, but instead of the current 37%, I think we should have the top tax rate at 50%, which it was during much of Ronald Reagan’s administration. I understand that the wealthy have means of sheltering income from taxation so very little income would actually be taxed at that rate, but it would help.

Corporate taxes need to increase as well. Right now in this country we have corporations making billions of dollars of income while paying little or nothing in the way of taxes. Corporate tax rates have dropped and companies use all manner of clever means to dodge US income taxes. Some of that comes from sheltering income overseas through foreign subsidiaries. They can use foreign manufacturing along with playing with transfer pricing to show the income where is will be more leniently taxed. We need to begin to tax that foreign income, along with raising corporate tax rates.

We need to raise inheritance taxes. Only a tiny proportion of estates have to pay any tax at all, by most estimates less than 1%, and while the top inheritance tax rate is 40% the average estate that is taxed pays only 17%. The truly wealthy shelter their estates through trusts and other means to protect them from estate taxes. While we might not get a huge amount from this, it is an important signal.

Currently hedge fund managers only pay income tax at the capital gains rate. The idea of lower rates for capital gains was to encourage investment and compensate for putting money at risk. Those individuals have no money of their own at risk, but make money on how well their investors do. Since they have no money at risk, they should pay standard tax rates.

We need to raise or even eliminate the cap on Social Security and Medicare taxes. Currently we only tax the first $137,700 in income for Social Security and Medicare. While those funds currently have a surplus, it is estimated that by 2035 they will run out of money. That would be devastating to retirees and would likely require benefit cuts.

We also need to take a look at spending cuts. The US currently spends as much on its military as the next ten countries put together. We have roughly 800 military bases in some 70 countries with tens of thousands of troops stationed overseas. Do we need all of those bases and all of those troops there? We spend many billions on new weapons, some of which don’t even work properly. We buy weapons which even the Pentagon says we don’t need, because the manufacturing is in certain congressional districts. There is clearly money to be saved if we take a hard look and make some hard decisions.

We also spend billions in subsidies to already highly profitable companies. We give massive tax breaks to fossil fuel companies even as we know that burning those fossil fuels increases global warming and in many cases costs more than using renewable energy sources.

This is honestly only the tip of the iceberg. There is much that we can do to bring the federal budget into line. There will be pain to some companies and individuals, but that is part of the price if we truly want a healthy economy going forward.

Friday, April 24, 2020

FDR and the Death of Jews in the Holocaaust

Well, I lost another friend. They started on this thing about how FDR was antisemitic and that caused the death of Jews in the Holocaust. It is true that Jews died that might otherwise have lived. Most countries had limits on the number of Jews who were allowed to enter.

Roosevelt could have raised US limits, but didn't, and frankly he didn't because there was a deep streak of antisemitism in American society at the time. FDR was not going to go against that in order to save Jews, which is sad to say. At the time when Jews were being allowed to leave Europe, the Holocaust had not yet begun.

There were things like the MS St Louis with 937 Jews, which was not allowed to land in the US. Canada and Cuba also would not allow the MS St Louis to land. Roughly a quarter of those Jews died in the Holocaust.

Beyond that, during the war, some wanted the rail lines into the concentration camps bombed, which would have slowed transport to the camps. Instead FDR allowed the military to focus on attacking supplies, ammunition, and reinforcements for the German army. This probably shortened the war, and it is arguable which saved more lives.

My erstwhile friend essentially blamed FDR for the deaths of 4 million Jews, which is patently absurd. When I challenged her on that, she went off on me altogether. I have no problem with civil discourse and factual arguments, but when you become insulting and irrational, you will no longer be a friend.

Friday, April 10, 2020

Joe Biden Sexual Assault Accusation

I read about the sexual assault charge against Biden. It is somewhat disturbing. He backed a woman up against a wall, put his hand under her skirt and put his finger in her. When she reacted poorly, he backed off and tried to laugh it off. Biden denies that and there were no witnesses.

Also it happened in 1993, some 27 years ago. I note that the statute of limitations for sexual assault in DC is 10 to 15 years, depending on circumstances, and the assault was said to take place in his senate offices.

There do not seem to be any other women with similar accusations, though more than a few have said he hugged them in ways that made them uncomfortable. He has also said he's changed his behavior in that regard.

In contrast, we have Trump, who has had more than 20 women accuse him of sexual assault, while he was recorded talking about grabbing women by the p***y, and bragged about walking into the dressing rooms of underage females while they were not dressed.

I will not excuse Biden's behavior or dismiss the accusations against him. I still feel that he is by far the lesser of the evils in the presidential race.